I'm glad to hear from so many enthusiastic players on this topic. I appreciate your sharing.
Just to clarify, Blackjack & Poker are in fact different games with unique features, although they are related. For example you are related to your sibilngs. If you and a sibling ran for public office they would put you on two different ballots to be voted on because you are distinct. If 10 people voted for your sibling and 15 people voted for you and 20 people voted for the Opponent. Does that mean that you should be elected over the Opponent because the voters intended to vote for you because they voted for your sibling? I don't think it works like that. Just because you are related doesn't mean that you are the same. 10 people voted for your sibling for their unique features and hence did not vote for you and vice versa. Hence splitting the vote between you and your sibling allows people to vote on your unique features.
However, given that your concerns about voters indifference to the gambling game may be plausible. I have offered a compromise against the original plan of only picking the top 2. The compromise is that the final poll could include the top 4. It looks as if Strip Poker earned enough votes to make it into the top 4 and the final poll. If in fact voters are indifferent to BlackJack or Poker then we'll know by the way they vote for Strip Poker. I will not be combining Poker & Blackjack in the final round because they are distinct and some voters may have voted based on their unique features. Given that the original idea was only to pick the top 2, I feel like this compromise is actually a win for your cause since Strip Poker would not have made the final 2 initially. Now you still get a chance to vote on it in the final round.
Lastly i think that all this talk about Strip Poker & Blackjack is giving a lot of publicity to it and potentially influencing the vote. So i must say this to finish. I'm willing to compromise based on the plausible arguments made. However, i'm not in favor of Strip Poker because of the high risk of losing money. If it gets developed and people start losing money, they'll still complain about it and that won't help improve our economy. If you decide to play any gambling game, beware and play with money you can afford to risk losing.
Hence i'm in favor of other ideas that aim to improve the economy like Sperm Bank, Interest Incum, Sex Exp Point Exchange for Cash and others.
Just to clarify, Blackjack & Poker are in fact different games with unique features, although they are related. For example you are related to your sibilngs. If you and a sibling ran for public office they would put you on two different ballots to be voted on because you are distinct. If 10 people voted for your sibling and 15 people voted for you and 20 people voted for the Opponent. Does that mean that you should be elected over the Opponent because the voters intended to vote for you because they voted for your sibling? I don't think it works like that. Just because you are related doesn't mean that you are the same. 10 people voted for your sibling for their unique features and hence did not vote for you and vice versa. Hence splitting the vote between you and your sibling allows people to vote on your unique features.
However, given that your concerns about voters indifference to the gambling game may be plausible. I have offered a compromise against the original plan of only picking the top 2. The compromise is that the final poll could include the top 4. It looks as if Strip Poker earned enough votes to make it into the top 4 and the final poll. If in fact voters are indifferent to BlackJack or Poker then we'll know by the way they vote for Strip Poker. I will not be combining Poker & Blackjack in the final round because they are distinct and some voters may have voted based on their unique features. Given that the original idea was only to pick the top 2, I feel like this compromise is actually a win for your cause since Strip Poker would not have made the final 2 initially. Now you still get a chance to vote on it in the final round.
Lastly i think that all this talk about Strip Poker & Blackjack is giving a lot of publicity to it and potentially influencing the vote. So i must say this to finish. I'm willing to compromise based on the plausible arguments made. However, i'm not in favor of Strip Poker because of the high risk of losing money. If it gets developed and people start losing money, they'll still complain about it and that won't help improve our economy. If you decide to play any gambling game, beware and play with money you can afford to risk losing.
Hence i'm in favor of other ideas that aim to improve the economy like Sperm Bank, Interest Incum, Sex Exp Point Exchange for Cash and others.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/kyp9I5zF9Wk63JnCG3/giphy.gif)
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media.giphy.com/media/VCnqfX5nOnWADoRkgb/giphy.gif)