Emmie - you are cool, I like you.   And I didn't take any of that personally, no worries.
  And I didn't take any of that personally, no worries.  
Sharp - you are correct, I do not, in fact, work in a field that requires deep understanding of such laws. I am going by common sense. If I put in the time and effort to make something better (add value to it) then I should be, from said position of common sense, able to capitalize on the value that I added to a product or service. Not on the base offering, but on the value added. Because otherwise, if the company declares that value aded by third party is company property - that is fraud, since I received no renumeration from the company for it. Again - with the correction, that if ToS that I have agreed to initially specified that such value is the property of the company - in that case you are correct, and I own no part of it.
One thing I would ask of you, respectfully, of course - please refrain from implying that I am a moron simply because I am Russian or that I live in Russia. I could not care less what you think of the Russian government (actually, I don't much care about your opinion of me, personally, either ), but the remark that "being based in Russia may not help with your understanding of laws" implies that I am a village idiot, to be frank.  If you want to call me stupid - have the decency to do so straight out, without politically correct implications
 ), but the remark that "being based in Russia may not help with your understanding of laws" implies that I am a village idiot, to be frank.  If you want to call me stupid - have the decency to do so straight out, without politically correct implications   
	
	
	
	
 And I didn't take any of that personally, no worries.
  And I didn't take any of that personally, no worries.  Sharp - you are correct, I do not, in fact, work in a field that requires deep understanding of such laws. I am going by common sense. If I put in the time and effort to make something better (add value to it) then I should be, from said position of common sense, able to capitalize on the value that I added to a product or service. Not on the base offering, but on the value added. Because otherwise, if the company declares that value aded by third party is company property - that is fraud, since I received no renumeration from the company for it. Again - with the correction, that if ToS that I have agreed to initially specified that such value is the property of the company - in that case you are correct, and I own no part of it.
One thing I would ask of you, respectfully, of course - please refrain from implying that I am a moron simply because I am Russian or that I live in Russia. I could not care less what you think of the Russian government (actually, I don't much care about your opinion of me, personally, either
 ), but the remark that "being based in Russia may not help with your understanding of laws" implies that I am a village idiot, to be frank.  If you want to call me stupid - have the decency to do so straight out, without politically correct implications
 ), but the remark that "being based in Russia may not help with your understanding of laws" implies that I am a village idiot, to be frank.  If you want to call me stupid - have the decency to do so straight out, without politically correct implications   
	 
 

