(11-08-2016, 04:21 PM)slidytaz Wrote: Well...
I too am thinking a "watcher" possibility is a great plus to have. That would be for people in room but not in intercourse only.

3some MMF with a DP is to be expected too.

Shapes : B-cups girls tits, BBWs, skinnies, height not all the same, manhood of different size too

(11-08-2016, 09:41 PM)Putita Wrote:

(11-08-2016, 04:21 PM)slidytaz Wrote: Well...
I too am thinking a "watcher" possibility is a great plus to have. That would be for people in room but not in intercourse only.

3some MMF with a DP is to be expected too.

Shapes : B-cups girls tits, BBWs, skinnies, height not all the same, manhood of different size too

... there are B cup tits, take a look on me

(11-09-2016, 04:40 PM)chaosfire235 Wrote:

(11-08-2016, 09:41 PM)Putita Wrote:

(11-08-2016, 04:21 PM)slidytaz Wrote: Well...
I too am thinking a "watcher" possibility is a great plus to have. That would be for people in room but not in intercourse only.

3some MMF with a DP is to be expected too.

Shapes : B-cups girls tits, BBWs, skinnies, height not all the same, manhood of different size too

... there are B cup tits, take a look on me

...Aren't those C-cups as registered by the game? At least in character creation.

• semen stays on the different bodyparts of the performer from one person serviced to the next (basically coded like the clothes in stripper mode, except they can only be "put on" by someone cumming after a specific pose - could have a "wipe" button on the performer's part to remove it, though)
  
• service two person at once, one on each side of the stall, either one at a time (mirroring 1 on 1 positions is easy) or with specific "2 at a time" positions (see current glory hole minigame)
  
• fully anonymous mode : since it's a gloryhole, only the genitals of the serviced person would be visible on screen, using their avatar's skin tones and pubic settings, but for true gloryhole experience, their name shouldn't be visible anywhere, with just a notification somewhere on their side of the interface when they are being serviced.
  
• not a feature per se, but we can imagine that this whole glory hole feature could be a successor to strip poles as a "premium only", hence pushing strip poles into the free game, just like new premium bed poses push older ones in the non-premium set.
  
• if the former option is picked, then the glory hole could implement some monetary feature, be it as an entry fee at the benefit of the performer, or as a tipping mechanism, like the existing strip poles.
  

• allowing access to private messaging via clicking on someone's name in the chat rather than on their avatar (or even bette, via a /MP [nickname] command directly in the chat)
  
• allowing private message access in stripper mode, and possibly during bed scenes
  
• spectator/peeper mode on existing poses when spectators are in the same room
  
• some form of outdoor public sex, with spectator mode enabled by default for everyone
  
• more manual modes on poses that don't have much of it (eg : boob rub in "get on top", tip licking in "boob-job", etc ..)
  
• give the ladies some control in further threesome poses ^^
  

(11-10-2016, 10:40 AM)Cleo Wrote: Here are two things I'd like to see in the game.

1) in-bed accessories

The idea would be to switch on/off some cosmetic accessories on the existing poses without altering the motions, on the same principle used for switching clothes on and off in the stripper interface by checking/unchecking boxes in a collapsible menu. Now, I realize that it might look like a big investment of programming resources, first to develop the interface, then to implement each "sprite" of clothing and accessory, and how it interacts/sticks to the bodies for each existing and future pose. However, when you think about it, the initial investment may be well worth it given all what you can do with it afterwards, killing several birds with one stone.

First you can improve the "life expectancy" (for lack of a better word) of each pose (both existing and future ones) before they get boring and people ask for new ones, simply because varying combinations of accessories make things less repetitive from one bed session to another.

Second, while having some accessories like lingerie has been requested several times in this thread, you could also use the initial programming investment to fulfill other requests with the same interface, such as the demand for tattoos and piercings (this one may require that accessories settings be saved account-wise), or the demand for some BDSM opportunities (see the "poses" thread). When you look at the existing poses, several could easily be spiced up to look like BDSM poses, simply by adding some shackles and ropes here, a blindfold and gag there, nipple clamps, and so on... , and you've fulfilled yet another request with the same initial programming investment, without having to develop a whole new pose dedicated to BDSM that may or may not even be useful to everyone.

Finally, adding one new accessory once in a while the same way you add outdoor clothing items may be a good way to throw a bone at the players when you're developing a big update that takes a lot of time and people are impatient for novelties. Also, not every accessory has to be implemented in absolutely every pose, some may be exclusive to certain poses depending on camera angle or body motions.



2) player-based glory holes

In general, I'm fully supporting the ideas of spectator mode and/or public sex already mentioned in this thread, and I've thought of a specific variant of it : glory holes
The idea would, again, take inspiration from the current stripper mode, and consist of glory hole stalls installed in a publicly accessible place, just like the strip poles at the vodka bar. For example, the place could be accessible from the brothel, the bathhouse, the saloon's toilets, or even a completely new location dedicated to it, developers' choice.

As a basic principle, a volunteer lady would hop in the stall and the stall's appearance from outside would change to show it is ocupied, just like with strip poles. Then other participants could enter the stall and be queued. The first in line would be serviced while the others in the queue would still be able to view the scene as peepers (again, like strip poles). The girl would then have access to different basic poses : blowjob, boobjob, anal, vaginal, and maybe more if the developers fancy it (hand-job, dick licking, possibly pussy licking if you want to include and allow female avatars as viewers ...). This may or may not include different speeds like in the current bed sessions, but I think the one feature that would be greatly appreciated would be manual mode, so "performers" could really develop and show their personal skills and style.

As for the orgasm part, there are different possibilities each with their pros and cons. If the male decides when to cum, this allows more interaction but may lead to people blocking the queue longer than reasonably acceptable. If the "performer" decides when the cumming happens, it feels of course less interactive and natural, but at least, they get control on their whole performance and style, and no possibility for griefers. Finally, the performer would have a "next" button to switch to the next person in line.

These would be the basic features, but we can obviously imagine some optional ones, depending on what the developers can / have the time to / want to implement. Some examples in no particular order :

• semen stays on the different bodyparts of the performer from one person serviced to the next (basically coded like the clothes in stripper mode, except they can only be "put on" by someone cumming after a specific pose - could have a "wipe" button on the performer's part to remove it, though)
  
• service two person at once, one on each side of the stall, either one at a time (mirroring 1 on 1 positions is easy) or with specific "2 at a time" positions (see current glory hole minigame)
  
• fully anonymous mode : since it's a gloryhole, only the genitals of the serviced person would be visible on screen, using their avatar's skin tones and pubic settings, but for true gloryhole experience, their name shouldn't be visible anywhere, with just a notification somewhere on their side of the interface when they are being serviced.
  
• not a feature per se, but we can imagine that this whole glory hole feature could be a successor to strip poles as a "premium only", hence pushing strip poles into the free game, just like new premium bed poses push older ones in the non-premium set.
  
• if the former option is picked, then the glory hole could implement some monetary feature, be it as an entry fee at the benefit of the performer, or as a tipping mechanism, like the existing strip poles.
  

Finally, there are a few other ideas that were mentioned in this thread and that I'd like to support, without specifically writing a wall of text about them ^^

• allowing access to private messaging via clicking on someone's name in the chat rather than on their avatar (or even bette, via a /MP [nickname] command directly in the chat)
  
• allowing private message access in stripper mode, and possibly during bed scenes
  
• spectator/peeper mode on existing poses when spectators are in the same room
  
• some form of outdoor public sex, with spectator mode enabled by default for everyone
  
• more manual modes on poses that don't have much of it (eg : boob rub in "get on top", tip licking in "boob-job", etc ..)
  
• give the ladies some control in further threesome poses ^^
  

thanks